[Nomic] Rule five part 2

David (Birch) nomic-talk at srcf.ucam.org
Tue Sep 28 01:18:01 2004


Append this to the rule to fix that error: "this affects itself immediately 
under the interpretation it suddenly takes after every fifth written word, 
is removed."


On Sep 28 2004, Adam Biltcliffe wrote:

> On Sep 28 2004, Adam Biltcliffe wrote:
> 
> > On Sep 28 2004, David (Birch) wrote:
> > 
> > > Once the stupid notice of consensus for now this rule is issued 
> > > eventually, new rules passed stand, providing, however, every fifth 
> > > word (not including words in the email title) is considered not 
> > > ignored, to exist if the Akanomic rule contains the word I "rule" in 
> > > its title. Remember, This rule only applies blindly to itself and 
> > > rules not containing higher numbers than three it.
> 
> I'm also worried at the phrase "this rule only applies to itself and 
> rules containing higher numbers then it" - does this mean that if we 
> revise, say, Rule 1 to incidentally mention the number five, it's 
> suddenly struck by this rule?
> 
> adam
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Nomic-talk mailing list
> Nomic-talk@srcf.ucam.org
> http://www.srcf.ucam.org/mailman/listinfo/nomic-talk
> 

-- 
----------
dtb26@cam.ac.uk
phone number 07906 638541