[Nomic] Rule five part 2

[Adam Biltcliffe]

On Sep 28 2004, Adam Biltcliffe wrote:

> On Sep 28 2004, David (Birch) wrote:
> 
> > Once the stupid notice of consensus for now this rule is issued 
> > eventually, new rules passed stand, providing, however, every fifth 
> > word (not including words in the email title) is considered not 
> > ignored, to exist if the Akanomic rule contains the word I "rule" in 
> > its title. Remember, This rule only applies blindly to itself and rules 
> > not containing higher numbers than three it.

I'm also worried at the phrase "this rule only applies to itself and rules 
containing higher numbers then it" - does this mean that if we revise, say, 
Rule 1 to incidentally mention the number five, it's suddenly struck by 
this rule?

adam