[FRA:] Marcuse question

[matthew piscioneri]

Ken,

totalizing critiques are perhaps by their nature unsatisfying. It's 
interesting that the totalizing critique of the enlightenment offered in 
H&A's DoE fails to resist the very instinct that is the object of their 
critique. Also interesting that Habermas's critique of H&A and the 
neo-Nietzscheans also adopts a totalizing response to their 
counter-enlightenment stance. So, in the interests of promoting 
non-totalizing critiques, is there anything in the DoE that you find 
worthwhile?

cheers,

mattP