[FRA:] Marcuse question

[James Rovira]

Steve -- the link seemed to me to be relevant to this discussion by way of
providing a historically oriented definition of liberalism/the enlightenment
and postmodernism's critique of enlightenment thinking.  That was about it.


Ralph -- it seems rather one dimensional to think that the only alternative
to liberalism is fascism.  Where does Marxism fit in?  Irrelevant?  From
Knauss's perspective and mine, it's valuable for its critique of
liberalism.  And who said anything about Heidegger?  I don't recall mention
of Heidegger in the article or in my post...perhaps I missed something.

Jim R.