FS & Praxis

Thu, 3 Apr 2003 15:53:49 EST

--part1_62.2ee85851.2bbdf95d_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Filipe

The piece by claire and myself is at www.lawandreligion.com   vol 3 or via 
the nuremberg project link from that site. It's pretty long and highly 
empirical but does relate to the frustrations of trying to realise aspects of 
FS theory in difficult insituttional contexts, and neumann was pretty dogged 
and politically determined - as well as politically engaged despite all the 
setbacks. It is worth remembering that Neumann was far more prestigeous and 
well-respected in the 1940-1954 period than marcuse, even in their joint 
writings FN was clearly the leading light. Marcuse was of course more 
theoretically sophisticated, esp in his reading of Hegel and early Marx. 

Michael Salter 

--part1_62.2ee85851.2bbdf95d_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<HTML>Filipe 
 
The piece by claire and myself is at www.lawandreligion.com&nbsp;&nbsp; vol=20=
3 or via the nuremberg project link from that site. It's pretty long and hig=
hly empirical but does relate to the frustrations of trying to realise aspec=
ts of FS theory in difficult insituttional contexts, and neumann was pretty=20=
dogged and politically determined - as well as politically engaged despite a=
ll the setbacks. It is worth remembering that Neumann was far more prestigeo=
us and well-respected in the 1940-1954 period than marcuse, even in their jo=
int writings FN was clearly the leading light. Marcuse was of course more th=
eoretically sophisticated, esp in his reading of Hegel and early Marx. 
 
Michael Salter </HTML>

--part1_62.2ee85851.2bbdf95d_boundary--