INTELLECTUALS, reason & al.
H. Curtiss Leung
hleung at prolifics.com
Wed, 30 Jul 1997 01:47:09 -0400 (EDT)
Jonathan Broad writes:
>
> To Ralph, who I suspect is either a Marxist-Humanist or something close:
> What did you mean by the "Universal", which is the "development of human
> beings" or somesuch? I sympathize with your stance that there are many
> things which cannot be learned except by engagement with those you call
> "working class", but I find your language suspect. "Development" can only
> be managed within a totality, and one articulation of the Marxist position
> has determined that said "development" can only be had via a statist
> revolution. Do you believe that the "universal" is an ahistorical
> perspective accessible to human consciousness via a "party" organization?
> Is this party sole propriator of the universal "theory" or perspective?
> Are its articulations and actions in some sense guided by this totality?
Boy, if there's one thing I can't stand, it's Red-baiting.
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Curtiss Leung Voice: (212)267-7722 x3033
hleung@prolifics.com Facsimile: (212)608-6753
---------------------------------------------------------------------------