[Nomic] Money Money Money: Summary (3)

[Carrie Oliver]

On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 02:09:40 +0100, Stuart Moore <stjm2@cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> Updated Summary: We're waiting for Dave and Carrie, since the rule of
> Assumed Consent appears to be functionally equivalent to hitting the
> game with a dodo.

I think I should be offended.

> 
> Proposal for the creation of the rule "Screw you, Anti Capitalists"
> (Version 2, see 18:39 25/09)
> For:         Stuart,  JJ, Jonathan, Martin O'Leary, Martin Lester, Mike,
> Adam
> Against:
> No comment:  David, , Carrie,

Aye, althought I believe I have already said so. And isn't assumed
consent now active so it doesn't matter!

> 
> Proposal for the creation of the rule "A job? What's that then?"
> For:         Stuart, Carrie, Jonathan, Martin O'Leary, Martin Lester,
> Mike, Adam
> Against:
> No comment:  David,
> Reserving Judgement: , JJ
> 
> Proposal for the creation of the rule "Bureaucrats (Inc)"
> For:         Stuart, Jonathan,  Martin O'Leary, Martin Lester
> Against:     Carrie, Mike, JJ, Adam
> No comment:  David,
> Reserving Judgement:
> 
> "Who's the banker in the black?"
> For:         Stuart, JJ, Jonathan, Martin O'Leary, Martin Lester, Mike, Adam
> Against:
> No Comment: David, , Carrie, ,
> 
Aye. Once again I really don't have to say this do I?

Carrie

> _______________________________________________
> Nomic-talk mailing list
> Nomic-talk@srcf.ucam.org
> http://www.srcf.ucam.org/mailman/listinfo/nomic-talk
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Nomic-talk mailing list
> Nomic-talk@srcf.ucam.org
> http://www.srcf.ucam.org/mailman/listinfo/nomic-talk
>