[Nomic] Attempted scam...

[Jonathan David Amery]

> On Sep 28 2004, Jonathan David Amery wrote:
> 
> > I note that Rule Three fails to actually state that the list it
> > requires is the List of Voters; indeed looking at the web page, since
> > it contains a pseudonym it appears to be the List of Handles.
> 
> I don't think you can argue anything from the appearance of the web page, 
> especially since the web page claims quite unambiguously (although possibly 
> erroneously) that the list given is the List of Voters. Also, the rule 
> describing the List of Handles clearly states that the first element in 
> each pair is an entry in the List of Voters; therefore, if you assert that 
> this list *is* the List of Handles, your argument that there is no List of 
> Voters cannot possibly be true.

 I did only say "appears to be" :).
 
> I'm in favour of taking the first option and fixing the phrasing of Rules 1 
> and 3 ASAP. Anyone with me?
> 
 The first option sounds plausible.

 WC.