[Nomic] Stuff (plus new proposal)

[Stuart Moore]

Adam Biltcliffe wrote:

> 
> I still think we need to revise the voting system, specifically to address:
> 
> - Make sure proposals and revisions thereof are sufficiently distinct 
> that this confusion can't arise so easily 

Agreed. The Autonomic is one way to do this, as you cannot edit an 
existing proposal, you must add a new one and delete the old one

> - Eliminate the need for 
> unanimity (although I know people are against this) 

I want to see where the game goes in the mean time-especially since 
we're going to be coming up and so probably without net access at 
various points over the next few weeks, so it might be better to wait 
until everyone was up in Cam and established

> - Give proposals a 
> time limit, so the outcome of a proposal is definitely known after a 
> particular point

I like the idea, but see my comment above-once we're back in Cam, 
this'll be far more reliable. Until I know I have a good network 
connection I'd vote against.

> 
> I also propose the following new rule:
> 
> ==========
> Insufficient Notices
> 
> Any voting entity who creates a document purporting to be a Notice of 
> Consensus which is not in fact valid shall be guilty of the crime of 
> Taking Insufficient Notice. ==========
> 

Aye