[Nomic] Money Money Money

[Carrie Oliver]

On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 12:12:31 +0100, Stuart Moore <stjm2@cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> Carrie Oliver wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 11:58:34 +0100, Stuart Moore <stjm2@cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> >
> >>How's this for an idea (each rule is a separate proposal, although
> >>without the first they make little sense)
> >>
> >>Proposal the creation of the rule "Screw you, Anti Capitalists"
> >>---
> >>Each member of the list of voters will have an associated account with
> >>The "Bank of Anarchic Neurotic Kleptomaniacs" (The BANK). This account
> >>consists of a non-negative integer of Currency. All accounts begin with
> >>balance zero.
> >>---
> >>
> >>Proposal for the creation of the rule "A job? What's that then?"
> >>---
> >>Each member of the list of voters will have their BANK accounts
> >>increased by one currency unit at midnight each night.
> >>---
> >>
> >>Proposal for the creation of the rule "Bureaucrats (Inc)"
> >>---
> >>On distribution of a valid Notice of Consensus, each member of the list
> >>of voters shall have the contents of their BANK account multiplied by
> >>1.2 and rounded up to an integer amount.
> >>---
> >>
> >>I'm not sure what we'll do with them yet. I was thinking about being
> >>able to spend money to get a consensus of opinion, if people haven't all
> >>agreed, but I haven't got a method I'm happy with
> >
> >
> > Nay. This once again seems biased toward people who submit many proposals.
> >
> >
> 
> It's possible to go for the first two without having the 3rd, if you
> think money should be independent of the number of proposals
> 
> 

Oh, true. Hmmmm... lets see. Aye to the first 2. Nay to the last.

CArrie


> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Nomic-talk mailing list
> Nomic-talk@srcf.ucam.org
> http://www.srcf.ucam.org/mailman/listinfo/nomic-talk
>