[Nomic] Proposals -- Simplification
Carrie Oliver
nomic-talk at srcf.ucam.org
Fri Sep 24 12:12:03 2004
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 10:42:03 +0100, Jonathan David Amery
<jdamery@ysolde.ucam.org> wrote:
> I think either of these produce a better and simpler wording...
>
> Proposal the first:
> ====
> Change Rule 4, Consensus of Opinion to read:
> ---
> A Consensus of Opinion on a particular issue exists if:
> a) one entity named on the List of Voters (the proposer) makes
> a proposal describing the issue to all other entities named on
> the List of Voters.
> b) either:
> i) All other entities on the List of Voters unambiguously consent
> to the proposal.
> ii) 72 hours have passed since the most recent version of the
> proposal and no entity on the List of Voters has vetoed it.
> c) The proposer posts a public Notice of Consensus to the other
> members detailing the issue upon which Consensus of Opinion has
> been reached.
> ---
> ====
Aye
>
> Proposal the second (with one-off wording):
> ====
> Change Rule 4, Consensus of Opinion to read:
> ---
> A Consensus of Opinion on a particular issue exists if:
> a) one entity named on the List of Voters (the proposer) makes
> a proposal describing the issue to all other entities named on
> the List of Voters.
> b) either:
> i) All other entities on the List of Voters unambiguously consent
> to the proposal.
> ii) 72 hours have passed since the most recent version of the
> proposal and no more than one entity on the List of Voters has
> vetoed it.
> c) The proposer posts a public Notice of Consensus to the other
> members detailing the issue upon which Consensus of Opinion has
> been reached.
> ---
> ====
>
Nay
Carrie
> _______________________________________________
> Nomic-talk mailing list
> Nomic-talk@srcf.ucam.org
> http://www.srcf.ucam.org/mailman/listinfo/nomic-talk
>