[Nomic] Proposals -- Simplification

Carrie Oliver nomic-talk at srcf.ucam.org
Fri Sep 24 12:12:03 2004


On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 10:42:03 +0100, Jonathan David Amery
<jdamery@ysolde.ucam.org> wrote:
> I think either of these produce a better and simpler wording...
> 
> Proposal the first:
> ====
> Change Rule 4, Consensus of Opinion to read:
> ---
> A Consensus of Opinion on a particular issue exists if:
>  a) one entity named on the List of Voters (the proposer) makes
>    a proposal describing the issue to all other entities named on
>    the List of Voters.
>  b) either:
>    i) All other entities on the List of Voters unambiguously consent
>      to the proposal.
>   ii) 72 hours have passed since the most recent version of the
>      proposal and no entity on the List of Voters has vetoed it.
>  c) The proposer posts a public Notice of Consensus to the other
>    members detailing the issue upon which Consensus of Opinion has
>    been reached.
> ---
> ====


Aye

> 
> Proposal the second (with one-off wording):
> ====
> Change Rule 4, Consensus of Opinion to read:
> ---
> A Consensus of Opinion on a particular issue exists if:
>  a) one entity named on the List of Voters (the proposer) makes
>    a proposal describing the issue to all other entities named on
>    the List of Voters.
>  b) either:
>    i) All other entities on the List of Voters unambiguously consent
>      to the proposal.
>   ii) 72 hours have passed since the most recent version of the
>      proposal and no more than one entity on the List of Voters has
>      vetoed it.
>  c) The proposer posts a public Notice of Consensus to the other
>    members detailing the issue upon which Consensus of Opinion has
>    been reached.
> ---
> ====
> 

Nay

Carrie

> _______________________________________________
> Nomic-talk mailing list
> Nomic-talk@srcf.ucam.org
> http://www.srcf.ucam.org/mailman/listinfo/nomic-talk
>