[Nomic] Aye... Feathers...

[Mike Cripps]

David (Birch) wrote:
> I propose the following two rules:
> 
> 19: A lemon? Already?
> 
> The entity known as "Carrie" shall redefine the meanings of "aye" and 
> "nay" as she sees fit at midnight each day. Entities have the right to 
> request the meanings of "yay" and "nay" from Carrie, and in return, she 
> has the right to set simple tasks (such as "deliver this plank") that 
> must be accomplished before said information is given. Should Carrie 
> give contradictory information to different players, she shall be 
> defined to be guilty of the crime of "extreme naughtiness" for 24 hours 
> starting at the point of discovery of the deception.
> 
> (note: Voters do not, of course, need to use these particular words to 
> vote unambiguously, and may instead use "urk" and "whoopee!" or any 
> other such words, so long as their intent is clear.)

Vote Nay

> 
> 20: The Feathers rule. Any player found quilty of the crime of "extreme 
> naughtiness" is punishable by the punishment of tickling, and may be 
> punished by any voter. The punishment may be administered at any time 
> during the period that the person guilty of extreme naughtiness is 
> defined to be guilty for.
> 
> 

Nay - unworkable (I'm in London...)

> _______________________________________________
> 
>> Nomic-talk mailing list
>> Nomic-talk@srcf.ucam.org
>> http://www.srcf.ucam.org/mailman/listinfo/nomic-talk
>>
>