[Nomic] and for sanity's sake

[Adam Biltcliffe]

On Sep 23 2004, John-Joseph Wilks wrote:

> Aye, but are we 
> sure we actually *want* this to be reworded so as not to apply to rules 
> specifically, rather than creating slightly different methods for other 
> things? We're likely to want the ability for players to do something 
> without having to obtain concensus from all others at some point.

Then all we have to do is not require Consensus of Opinion to exist for 
those actions. It's a mechanic which can be applied to anything the rules 
choose to apply it to, but it doesn't purport to have any influence over 
the rest of the rules except where they choose to require it.

adam