[foxtrot] changes to successfulresult

[Alan Lawrence]

Erm....well, I hoped it would too :-)

In order to store multiple factors in SuccessfulResult, I had to change
the internal representation into an array. I kept the original constructor
to avoid breaking Mike's code, and rewrote ServerImpl myself. But methinks
rewriting the testing code is inevitable - even if I kept the
getFactor1() and getFactor2() methods, any code calling those methods
would have to check for the number of factors first anyway :-(

Sorry!

--Alan



On Sat, 24 Feb 2001, Matej Pfajfar wrote:

> I'll update the javadoc now!
> Al I thought you were *just* going to add another constructor? The old
> testing code should compile!
> 
> Mat
> 
> On Sat, 24 Feb 2001, M. Shreeve wrote:
> 
> > Hello
> > Just a quick query:  Has SuccessfulResult's spec been changed and the
> > change not reflected in javadoc?  This is kind of annoying since a fair
> > amount of test code now doesn't compile.  If the change is now permanent
> > then Shahrum and I will make the necessary changes.  Mat - this may delay
> > us a little...
> > 
> > See you all around,
> > 
> > Matt
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Foxtrot mailing list
> > Foxtrot@srcf.ucam.org
> > http://www.srcf.ucam.org/mailman/listinfo/foxtrot
> > 
> 
> Matej Pfajfar
> St John's College, University of Cambridge, UK
> 
> PGP Public Key @ www.telesat.si/~badbytes
> Most people are good people, the rest of us are going to 
> run the world. -- badbytes
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Foxtrot mailing list
> Foxtrot@srcf.ucam.org
> http://www.srcf.ucam.org/mailman/listinfo/foxtrot
>